United States Has A Gigantic Spy Center

As we all know by now of Edward Snowden, the whistle blower, a CIA employee who worked for Booz Allen Hamilton; a contractor for the National Security Agency who advised America of the collection of hundreds of millions of phone records, that the NSA had collected from the American people. He is a hero to some, a traitor to others; I will withhold judgment until the whole story has unfolded. One thing I do know, this young man did do us a favor by opening up our eyes to the ruthlessness of the Obama Administration, to spy on its own people. If Snowden broke any laws in doing this we will leave it up to the lawyers, but in the mean time you and I have to watch our backs from our own government. I am just wondering how far the government would have gone if Snowden did not blow the whistle.

In regard to the spy center that is being built my reference is from an article from the Associated Press. This center sits just south of Salt Lake City, Utah on a National Guard Base. The buildings are about 1.5 million square feet. They are filled with super powered computers designed to store massive amount of information gathered secretly from phone calls and emails. It looks like the government is really taking it serious of accumulating our phone records and emails.

When this center opens this fall it will be NSA’S largest data storage center in the U.S. There is a lot of secrecy with this project. James Blamford, the author of several books on the NSA, asserts that the facility will serve as the central depository for everything the NSA intercepts. Blamford theorizes the facility will be able to hold a so-called yottabyte of information, the largest measurement computer scientists have. A yottabyte is equal to 500 quintillion pages of text, said Bamford, who believes the Utah Center will store those phone records NSA gathered from Verizon Communications.

Just think how much this spy center will cost. We, the tax payers are paying for this spy center; we are paying for some huge spy center that will enable the government to spy on us, the American people. I would suggest you read that last sentence again so it will sink in.

Advertisements

United States Security Is All About Political Correctness

In Israel they worry about the people who are carrying the items, here in the U.S we worry about the items people are carrying. This is what Avi Dichter, the former head of Shin Bet, Israel’s security agency had said in an interview three years ago. Because one terrorist hid a bomb in his shoe, everyone now must take their shoes off. The previous was from an article by Michael Goodwin who writes for the New York Post.

On the one hand security officials allow terrorists through the cracks because they fear charges of anti-Muslim bias, and on the other hand they secretly get personal data from hundreds of millions of our phone records. Where are we going with this? We have to give up our rights as Americans because we are afraid to offend Muslims? We know the majority of Muslims are good people just as in any other ethnic group, but it must also be said that 99% of the attacks on the United States, domestically and internationally from the 1970’s till present have been from Muslims. Instead of President Obama condemning our possible way of speech against the Muslim community after an attack that was caused by a Muslim or Muslims, why can’t he say yes, it was caused by Muslims or don’t even mention the fact, but don’t condemn what one might possibly say. Doesn’t he trust our intelligence that we are not going to condemn a whole ethnic group? No matter what Obama tells us Americans and how he wants us to apply political correctness, it does not take away from the fact that there are elements of the Muslim community out there who want to kill us and they will not stop attempting to do so.

Us Americans as we have found out are being spied on from the Obama Administration; should we be the ones being spied on? Obama will not acknowledge that Muslims around the world are out to kill us in one fashion or another. I remember after 9/11 President Bush acknowledged that the pilots of the suicide mission who flew into the twin towers buildings were Muslim. He also told the Nation that the Muslims are a peaceful people. That’s what I want to hear from my President, tell it the way it is to the American people. This is what President Bush said; “The face of terror is not the true face of Islam, Islam is peace”. He went on to say that American Muslims “need to be treated with respect. In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect”.

This is reality Mr. President. We did not go to war with the radical jihadist who preach violent Jihad; they went to war with us; they attacked our home land. You do not use the word terrorist or the word war, but that’s what it is. These radicals are at war with us, and they will never be satisfied unless they do as much destruction to us as possible, and by you calling it something else will not change it.

America Needs The Reagan Democrats

We must take America back! This is just not a campaign slogan; its as real as real can be today. I warned Democrats that were going to vote for Obama what would happen. I have mentioned this so many times in other posts and I will keep on mentioning until maybe some Democrat out there will admit to the fact that they voted for a die hard socialist with Marxist emphasis. The ones that don’t see this are the left wing radicals of the Democratic Party. To take our country back we don’t have to include them in the formula. They are in their own socialist world. We have to concentrate on the five million conservatives who did not vote in the last election. They stayed home for whatever reasons; I use to tell any conservative that did not intend to vote because they didn’t like Romney of the fact that Romney was a capitalist; Obama was a socialist with Marxist influence. The outcome was five million stayed home. I use to say that many of the Tea Party voters stayed home because of Romney, that might have been one of the main reasons until the IRS scandal broke out and as we found out with the events still unfolding as I am writing the IRS intiminated the Tea Party by going after them. The IRS has also gone after conservative political groups, religious groups and any group that expressed the word Patriotism in its format. Can you imagine this in the United States of America. It was just a matter of time. Obama as I have said many times in my writing all through his life has hung around radicals, such as Socialists, Marxists, a terrorist such as Bill Ayers and a crazy Rev.Wright. So put this formula together and what do you get? a Constitutional crisis.

We need Democrats to bring our country back of the type that went for President Ronald Reagan in his two elections. They were called Democrats for Reagan. These Democrats are out there today, they don’t like what they are seeing. We need a candidate to attract these Democrats the same way President Reagan did. I have attached from Wikipedia the explanation of what was the Reagan Democrat. As you read it you will see the similarities of the reasons they went for Reagan and some similarities that are in todays political environment.

The Reagan Democrat From Wikipedia

The term can also be used to describe moderate Democrats who are more conservative than liberal on certain issues like national security and immigration. The term Reagan Democrat also refers to the vast sway that Reagan held over the House of Representatives during his presidency, even though the house had a Democratic majority during both of his terms.[1] The term also hearkens back to Richard Nixon’s Silent Majority; a concept that Ronald Reagan himself used during his political campaigns in the 1970s.

The work of Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg is a classic study of Reagan Democrats. Greenberg analyzed white ethnic voters (largely unionized auto workers) in Macomb County, Michigan, just north of Detroit. The county voted 63 percent for John F. Kennedy in 1960, but 66 percent for Reagan in 1980. He concluded that “Reagan Democrats” no longer saw Democrats as champions of their working class aspirations, but instead saw them as working primarily for the benefit of others: the very poor, feminists, the unemployed, African Americans, Latinos, and other groups. In addition, Reagan Democrats enjoyed gains during the period of economic prosperity that coincided with the Reagan administration following the “malaise” of the Carter administration. They also supported Reagan’s strong stance on national security and opposed the 1980s Democratic Party on such issues as pornography, crime, and high taxes.[1]

Many self-styled Reagan Democrats claim to be fiscal conservatives but still support many aspects of the core programs of the New Deal and the Great Society, while also supporting Ronald Reagan’s strong defense policies as well as his optimism in American culture. Some elements of the Tea Party fit this sketch[citation needed], but many other independents and Democrats could fall into the same category as well. It’s become a broad term, but that does not diminish the explanatory power behind it. One of the most prominent self-styled Reagan Democrats includes Virginia Senator Jim Webb,[3] whom columnist David Paul Kuhn asserts is the quintessential Reagan Democrat and one of the last of an ‘endangered species’ within the Democratic Party.[4]

As you have read above the Reagan Democrats were disenchanted with their party. I see the same parallel today. The Reagan Democrat knew that you needed the business person to provide the jobs. They know that from day one Obama has been putting the working person against the business person. This is text Karl Marx warfare. The Reagan democrat knows that a country cannot survive with that kind of ideology. There are many differences in the two parties as it is we don’t need a President to put the employee, against the employer, in other words don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

Democrats, Republicans, Conservatives, Tea Party and others. We can disagree on issues but we cannot lose our country to Marxism. We have to get that candidate again that believes in the American dream, not suppress it. If God is still on our side, if He is forgiving, because America has strayed in His Eyes, He will give us that candidate who will unite us all. He will give us today’s version of the Reagan Democrat.