Obama’s Back To Class Warfare In His Upcoming Address To The Nation

I am going to start off by writing the definition of “Income Inequality.”The unequal distribution of household or individual income across the various participants in an economy. Income inequality is often presented as the percentage of income to a percentage of population. Now first thing I will say is so what.This is not a communistic society where everyone is in the same productive status with everything going to the state and the state will determine what your occupation will be. One must remind Obama and believe me he knows exactly what he is doing that this country fought victoriously for our freedom for the pursuit of each individual to have life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and believe me this is not a happiness that will be bestowed on us by this socialist-in-chief Obama. This argument I predict of putting the classes against each other will no longer work because of the fact the people who use to complain about the business person are out of jobs and they see how dependent they were on that business person staying in business until Obama came along and starting giving top priority to the lazy, as a matter of fact he even got the women involved. He practically spent the whole presidential election cycle making women’s birth control a top issue. Like ex governor Mike Huckabee has stated recently, women should be insulted that he doesn’t give them more credit than that. I doubt very much that most women are dependent on the government.

“Obama is going to say that he wants to improve economic opportunities for every American.” Really? What year into the presidency is he now? Year five. He’s still talking about this? This socialist has been going out of his way to suppress jobs by making it harder for the business person to hire and expand via constant new regulations and to top it off his ultimate weapon of destroying our economy, Obama Care.You see my friends, all this garbage he is going to throw on us, the American people, is to distract from the failures of his policies and Obama Care.This is obvious. Yes I know, after his speech he’s going to get the usual high marks from his patsy’s the news media and don’t forget in the world of academia he will get all those socialistic professors just giving phrase to their socialistic comrade, Obama. Lets not forget Chris Matthews of MSNBC he will get those feelings up his legs every time Obama speaks. All this will not change, what will change is that most of America watching this speech will be watching with high suspicion because most of America has figured out what a liar Obama is.

We already know that in this speech he will warn Congress, mainly the Republicans that if he doesn’t get what he wants he will go around Congress and find a way to implement what he wants. That’s why you see more and more stressing the point that Obama is acting like a king or a dictator. This has been self inflicted by Obama just by his actions. The only thing I must warn the Republicans is that this might be a trap to get the Republicans talking about impeachment. Don’t fall into that trap because we don’t have the Senate. Naturally the Rhinos must be defeated also but when the Republicans take full control of the Congress in November, you know what Obama? You will be impeached. Yes someone can say, why? He will only have two years left. The point is impeachment has to be done for the crimes Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have done against the United States Constitution, and we can’t leave out Hillary Clinton for her lies about Benghazi. These people will pay for taking our Constitution and try to destroy it.

                                                       

Advertisement

News Media Tried To Protect Obama And Clinton From Benghazi: The American People Don’t Buy It

There are about six or more on going scandals that Obama is involved in and another one that has both Obama and Hillary Clinton. I should say two because they are both involved also in Fast and Furious.I am very pleased that the American people looked right through the no reporting from the major news media on Benghazi. I have been saddened of the fact that the news media would be so openly involved in corruption and to go out of their way to protect these people. I assume that they have forgotten that in socialistic and communist societies they were the first to go, in other words they would have no competitors, usually there would be one state run newspaper.

This from a Fox News Poll. Some people will say, of course, its Fox. These same people should be happy there is a news outlet out there that reports all the news. I have found from past experiences that when the news outlets don’t give out any poll numbers that’s because they just don’t want to give them to us. They don’t want us to know them.

“Sixty percent of voters blame Clinton for what happened, according to a Fox News poll released Thursday.  That includes 28 percent who blame her “a great deal” and another 32 percent who say she deserves “some” blame.”

“Essentially the same number — 59 percent — blames Obama (26 percent “a great deal” and 33 percent “some”).”

I have mentioned a few times in the past that of all the scandals, Benghazi, when all the facts come out, and they are wholeheartedly investigating it (and all the others) as of this moment non stop, Benghazi will be the one to send some people away. Allowing four of our people to be murdered, Obama and Clinton both going on a two week parade and talking over the caskets of dead Americans that this was all because of a YouTube video. This is so disgusting, these people absolutely have no shame. The reason they have no shame is because they have done things like this before. It has become routine for them. How in the world have we as a country allowed people like this to lead the United States of America? We will persevere, we will not allow these people to get away with it. This is not a Banana Republic, there is only so much the American people will take. Hillary is scared stiff of Benghazi, when Benghazi is finished she won’t be talking about the presidency, she will be hiring a lawyer.

President Obama! Man Up And Stop Using The Race Card

I am asking president Obama to man up and stop using the race card.In an interview with New Yorker’s David Remnick Obama said his approval ratings are low because some American’s “don’t like the idea of a black president.” Really Obama? is this an instance where you are stirring the pot as you have been doing during your presidency on race, or is it a case of downright immaturity?

I can’t understand for the life of me,( a Harvard graduate no doubt, no one even remembers seeing him at Columbia) how he can even say that, considering he won the presidency twice with the help of the white vote. So now Obama is blaming race for his shortcomings. I knew eventually it would come to that because Obama has been race baiting before with others but now he put himself in the fold.

Lets go over a few events and circumstances just to bring us up to speed. Lets show the scandals that are still being investigated that involves the Obama Administration in one form or the other,here they are: Fast and Furious, IRS scandal, NSA scandal, spying on the Associated Press, spying on Fox News reporter James Rosen, Benghazi scandal, recess appointee scandal that is now in the US Supreme Court. Each one of these scandals after full investigations will warrant an impeachment for president Obama. So Obama, are these scandals contributing to your low poll numbers, or is it the race issue? Which is it?

Obama destroyed one of the best health care systems in the world to take away from the 85% who had health insurance to give to the 15% who don’t and they are now estimating that at the conclusion there will still be 30 million Americans who are not covered. In order for Obama to pursue this he lied to the American people by telling us “if we like our present insurance policy we can keep it, period,” if we like our doctor we can keep our doctor, period.” This under Obama Care is panning out to have been a lie. Premiums are climbing through the roof, deductibles are climbing sky high and the hospital emergency rooms will have more patients than ever with a lot less doctors.Over 6 million people have lost coverage and many more millions are to lose coverage after the employer mandate extension is lifted. So Obama, are these lies to the American people contributing to your low poll numbers, or is it the race issue? Which is it?

There are millions of Americans still unemployed and other millions who have stopped looking for work.Obama is destroying the small business person who supplies over 70% of the jobs because small business cannot hire or expand without knowing what else Obama has in store for them and the inconclusiveness of Obama Care. So Obama, are these applications of bad judgments contributing to your low poll numbers, or is it the race issue? Which is it?

The American people and millions who had voted for you in the past are pointing their finger at you president Obama. Live up to the fact that the American people have gotten wise to you and stop blaming the race card, that’s getting old. .

Obama Say’s He Is Still Allowing Spying On Americans

Obama last week gave a speech as to what his intent was to revamp the NRS. Obama stressed that bulk phone records of American citizens should be stored outside the government. He said this would reduce the risk of the records being abused. Some other agency will be holding the phone records, so what is that suppose to do. The thing is that American’s phone records will still be kept.

I see Obama is insulting the intelligence of the American people once again. He said that there should be a balance struck between our liberties and national security such as spying. (spying on us, the American people.) I will hold firm that to keep records of millions of people just in case they might be needed in a case is asinine. This is definitely going against the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.

Obama said that there must be a Judges advance approval before agencies can examine some ones data. Who is Obama kidding. This requirement is already on the books that a Judge must sign off. Do you recall the James Rosen scandal who works for Fox News where Attorney General Eric Holder gave his approval to spy on him. They had to go through a Judge and there were two Judges who turned it down before a third one approved. They just kept on bouncing around judges until the right one came along. Why would that change now? As you can see going through a Judge is a bunch of crap, from the example I just gave you it can be beat.

The final clincher is Obama is instructing Attorney General Eric Holder to find a solution within 60 days. This is the same Eric Holder who has not provided documents in regard to the Fast and Furious scandal to Congressional Committees by exercising an executive privilege order to keep said documents away from Congress. Obama, who has had no respect for the US Constitution is giving his patsy Eric Holder the responsibility of finding a solution to the bulk phone records. Don’t make me laugh. The solution is to stop collecting our personal records, period.

Within Minutes Officials Were Notified Benghazi Was Under A Terrorist Attack

“This from Fox News: “Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation’s top civilian and uniformed defense officials — headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama — were informed that the event was a “terrorist attack,” declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president’s Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.”

There you have it. It is now official as though we didn’t know it before, we the American people were lied to from the President of the United States that Benghazi was because of a You Tube video. What this proves is that the lies as we had all figured out already was to safe guard Obama’s election over Mitt Romney to making us think that Al Qaeda was defeated. What kind of president is this to lie to us so blatantly.

What kind of terrible, ruthless people are these. You recall Susan Rice going on five Sunday talk shows talking about the You Tube video. Just recently she advised of the fact that she covered for Hillary Clinton because Hillary was all so busy. Hillary is not all so busy, Hillary is all so ruthless.

“According to declassified testimony obtained by Fox News, Gen. Carter Ham, who at the time was head of AFRICOM, the Defense Department combatant command with jurisdiction over Libya, who was working out of his Pentagon office on the afternoon of Sept. 11 — said he learned about the assault on the consulate compound within 15 minutes of its commencement, at 9:42 p.m. Libya time, through a call he received from the AFRICOM Command Center.”

“Also among those whose secret testimony was declassified was Dempsey, the first person Ham briefed about Benghazi. Ham told lawmakers he considered it a fortuitous “happenstance” that he was able to rope General Martin E. Dempsey Dempsey and former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta into one meeting, so that, as Ham put it, “they had the basic information as they headed across for the meeting at the White House.”

There you have it, they were going at the time to a meeting at the White House. You know darn well that Obama was advised and the lie began. The big question now is who came up with the ridiculous lie that the attack was all about a You Tube video? It seems like a catty kind of lie to me. Does anyone like to guess? Someone came up with it! Who was it? HC

What I cannot understand is that when you enlist in the US military you swear that you will defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States. It looks like to me that Secretary of Defense Panetta and the officials under him did not at least speak up which to me is a breach of their oath. The rhythm in motion seems to be from Obama passed down to the others. How is the United States of America protected from within? That is now the big question.

President Obama Lacked “Passion” And “Conviction” Over War Strategy: Unlike President Bush

“Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Sunday escalated his already-tough criticism of President Obama, saying the president lacked “passion” and “conviction” over his Afghanistan war strategy.”

“Gates went on to suggest that the president was far more emotional about repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” — the policy barring openly gay people from serving in the military — and passing the health care bill.”

In his book Gates also mentions the fact that President Bush had a contrasting passion for the military. No matter what Bushes enemies have to say about Bush they cannot lay claim that he did not have passion for the military. If you and I can tell the love he exerted for the military you can imagine the military felt double the love. Like Gates said, he at times saw tears well up in Bushes eyes when he spoke to the military like I’m sure we have had on occasions, but you never saw Obama’s eyes well up.

When President Bush spoke to the military personal he spoke of victory with passion. What else does the military need to hear but be victorious. Lets face it, even the Obama supporters cannot lay claim that this president talks about victory. He can’t wait to get out. He did it under false pretenses and prematurely in Iraq and now you see that Al Qaeda is once again taking over, why? because Obama could care less. He wants that money for his social programs, for instance free cell phones distributed so he can win an election. What he cares about is the World Order, everybody is equal with everybody else, no longer the United States of America being a world power. No longer the world looking at us as a leader, respect and admiration.

One thing Gates mentioned was this has to be discussed now, not in 2017. This is the reason he came out with the book while Obama is still president. How can you run for President of the United States and not have a heart for our military. If you ask me, add this to another impeachable offense with all the other ones Obama has accumulated. On to the elections of 2014. “We will take our country back”.

Fifty Years Later President Lyndon Johnson’s War On Poverty Has Been A Failure

President Lyndon Johnson’s war on poverty is now 50 years old. It was passed January 8, 1964. I guess I can say the gesture was good but that’s as far as it goes. Johnson wanted to cure it and prevent it. Fifty years later as though we don’t know it government can’t cure or prevent anything. There is nothing that government can do to make our lives easier. That comes from free enterprise motivation. The best thing I believe to cure poverty is to talk about it in the school systems. Instead of pushing government control on our children show them what ambition and a free spirit can do for them. Talk to them about lifestyles and not to overburden themselves with unnecessary responsibilities before they can even get started in relation to getting financially set.

This is from a post by Jennifer Marshall titled: “How To Fight Poverty And Win.” Despite spending nearly $20 trillion since the War on Poverty began, the poverty rate remains nearly as high today as it was in the mid-1960s. Today, government spends nearly $1 trillion annually on 80 federal means-tested programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care and targeted social services for poor and low-income Americans. Clearly, policymakers can’t hide behind reams of programs and billions in spending and declare they’ve done their duty to the poor.

Transforming incentives to promote personal responsibility has a dramatic effect: After the 1996 welfare reform began to require recipients to work or prepare for work, welfare rolls fell by more than half, and poverty rates among single mothers and black children fell to historic lows. But that reform redirected the incentives of only one program among more than 80 federal welfare programs. What’s ironic its the program that president Obama going through the back door tried to ease the requirement to participate. If you recall this was done as he was running for president in 2012 in which will still come out of it one of the impeachable offenses against him. He was trying to change a law that was already passed by Congress. Now where have we heard that before. The one program that was showing results he attempted to dismantle it.

When the War on Poverty began, 8 percent of all children in America were born outside marriage. Since the mid-’60s, unwed childbearing has skyrocketed to more than 40 percent of all births, and from 25 percent to about 73 percent among black children.

Restoration of marriage must happen on a personal level, through the work of churches and community initiatives like First Things First in Chattanooga, TN, that build relational skills. These and other efforts to overcome poverty should engage us personally in the effort to help restore lives, families, and communities.

After fifty years it has been proven that throwing money will not cure societies ills, such as the war on poverty. I believe it is a community effort but most of that has been taken away from government programs to create the reliance on government. The problem is that the reliance on government will not help the poor, its only going to keep them poor. Education must be provided to show the poor what is out there for them if only they change their mind set and energize themselves to a better and more fruitful conditioning.

Lets Talk About New Jersey Governor Chris Christie

We remember Gov. Chris Christie giving the key note address at the Republican Convention as presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s key note speaker. I went away after listening to that speech thinking what kind of a keynote address was this considering that a lot of the speech was about himself. I was actually very annoyed by it. I came away comparing Christie to the comical loud mouth character of Ralph Kramden that Jackie Gleason portrayed in the old Honeymoon series.

The next episode of disappointment from Christie came from the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy that hit New Jersey hard in 2012 that put a stop to any momentum Mitt Romney might have had just before the presidential election that kept Romney out of the news for five days. Not only was Romney out of the news but this was the time that Chris Christie started kissing up to President Obama in front of a national audience, sucking up to him in an obvious fashion. Not only did Christie invite Obama to visit the destructive site of New Jersey but he obviously went out of his way not to invite Romney to do the same, I felt there was definitely something wrong with this picture. I saw some kind of vendetta here such as maybe Christie wanted to be Vice -President but he was not picked.

Everybody’s day such as a character of Christies eventually comes. Now you have Christie actually sounding like Obama. What happen in a city of New Jersey sounds like another vendetta type situation. “The governor released a brief written statement late Wednesday, following a report in The New York Times detailing emails involving his deputy chief of staff, Bridget Anne Kelly. They pertained to a bizarre incident in September, when lanes at the George Washington Bridge from Fort Lee, N.J., were closed for four days. Christie faced accusations that the lanes were blocked in retaliation over Mayor Mark Sokolich’s refusal to endorse him for re-election last November.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that emails show his deputy chief of staff suggested closures to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey two weeks before the incident.

“Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” she wrote to Christie confidant David Wildstein, according to the Times. At the time, Wildstein was on the Port Authority; he has since resigned.

So now we have a situation where Christie has picked up pointers from his new found friend Obama by saying this: “But Christie maintained Wednesday that he was “misled” and had no knowledge of his staff’s apparent involvement. Isn’t this something, Christie is saying he had no knowledge of this happening . Where have we heard this countless times before? I guess Christie is starting to find out something about life, “What goes around comes around.” I wonder who Chris Christie is going to kiss up to now. He sure can’t get rid of those e-mails.

Ex-Defense Secretary Robert Gates Throws Obama Under The Bus

Last week I wrote a post Titled, “Obama Gave Up On Iraq”: Al Qaeda Hasn’t. I wrote this after I learned that Al Qaeda was once again getting a foothold in Iraq. It is pretty obvious to me that Obama didn’t want anything to do with Iraq and he was pretentious that he cared about his self labeled good war Afghanistan. It is ironic that today Ex- Defense Secretary’s new book came out in which he is highly critical of President Obama’s leadership style.

Here are some inserts from his book. Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in his upcoming memoir, has harsh words for President Obama’s leadership style and commitment to the Afghanistan war, accusing the president of losing faith in his own strategy.“For him, it’s all about getting out,” he wrote.

Gates writes that by early 2010 he had concluded the president “doesn’t believe in his own strategy, and doesn’t consider the war to be his.”

The 70-year-old Gates writes that Obama appeared to doubt his own strategy in Afghanistan to the point of being “outright convinced it would fail.”

This is really bad; it doesn’t take much to think about it. We have sons and daughters over there to defend our country with all their vigor, toughness, and sacrifice and here we have a president who doesn’t consider the war to be his and doesn’t believe in his own strategy as expressed by Robert Gates. Take a pause and think about this. This is downright criminal on Obama’s part. He is the Commander-In Chief, as long as he has troops anywhere and anytime. He is to wholeheartedly plan a strategy for victory as much as we have found out by now Obama doesn’t like to use the word victory. As you can see, now we know why, Obama doesn’t have his heart in it and that being the case he shouldn’t be president

Obama Gave Up On Iraq: Al Qaeda Hasn’t

It has gotten to be that the United States involves itself with undeclared wars, sends our troops to fight and because there is a change of administrations there is a policy change for that conflict. How about the commitment we made to that country. Are those two words loyalty and honor of no merit any longer from our politicians. How about our troops who have lost lives and been wounded or lamed?

Discussions have to be made on any future conflicts the United States might involve itself with. It has to really be thought out as to the end game. The Democrats have done it with Vietnam and now they are doing it with Iraq. “Just let it go, that’s enough of this conflict, we are not interested any longer.” What if we did that in Europe at the end of World War II? All of Europe would now be under Communist control. Because we remained there all those years after the war, eventually the iron curtain came down.

As we read on keep in mind during the Benghazi lies Obama said that Al Qaeda was dead. Violence has increased in Iraq in 2013 to levels not seen in years, UN officials reported this week. They are worried that there will be bloodshed that was not seen since before the US troop surge.

I feel like many that Obama left Iraq too prematurely for political reasons as he is doing presently in Afghanistan. For Obama its always pacifying his base, the radical left.

US troops withdrew from Iraq at the end of 2011.The years immediately before and after that withdrawal, the level of violence remained relatively steady — and by Iraq standards, relatively low. The troop surge and other factors were credited with curbing the bloodshed from its 2004-2007 highs. But the 2013 death toll is roughly double what it had been in recent years

Since last December, the Sunnis have been protesting against what they perceive as discrimination at the hands of the country’s Shiite-led government and against tough anti-terrorism measures they say target their sect.

That tension, though, has been exploited by Al Qaeda in Iraq, as has the Syrian civil war next door.

So Obama! What are you going to do? Do you know, or do you care? After all! when you were running for president the first time you made it a point to declare Iraq the bad war and Afghanistan the good war. A president of the United States is suppose to honor the commitments made by our country. I remember when you pulled out of Iraq that if need be we will be available to supply the help needed if and when Iraq was in trouble by it’s enemies. Naturally that was mentioned by various opinions but I never heard it from Obama. They use to call Nixon “tricky Dick; they use to call Clinton, “slick Willie. “For Obama I think it should be, “don’t blame Me.” President Bush left Iraq in a good military position. So Obama will have no one to blame but himself if Iraq totally falls. That will be another mark against America on the world stage.