Hillary Clinton Claims She Supports Children And Families: If That’s The Case She Would Not Have Such A High Protectiveness For Abortion.

Hillary Clinton during the course of her presidential campaign has been running clips of her love of children and families. That’s kind of odd considering I wonder what her definition is of love of children. I assume that because of her so called love for children it would mean that she would love that same baby that the mother is still carrying during pregnancy as she would when the mother delivers that child to the physical family environment. The thing is you cant have it both ways, Hillary cannot say she is for children and family if she is willing to have that baby murdered while in the mothers womb. If you love a child it doesn’t matter if the child is still being carried in the mothers womb or after the mother delivers that child to the world, there should not be a difference of love for that child but it seems like Hillary has two standards of love for the child, before and after love and this is all about the hypocrisy of socialists such as Hillary. To make it all the worst even if you talk about late term abortions Hillary has taken the side of late term abortions.

The following was posted by Andrew Bair, published by Life News.com: “In May 2015, the U.S. House passed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to protect unborn babies 20 weeks and older from excruciating late abortions. In addition to a statement slamming House lawmakers for advancing the bill, Clinton tweeted, “When it comes to women’s health, there are two kinds of experts: women and their doctors. True 40+ years ago, true today.”

“Substantial medical and scientific evidence shows unborn babies are capable of feeling pain by 20 weeks after fertilization, if not earlier. It is well-documented here: http://www.doctorsonfetalpain.com. This developmental milestone forms the basis for the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. Yet Clinton chooses to ignore these facts of human biology, claiming the bill is “not based on sound science” per a statement by her campaign.”

I just cant imagine a person claiming the love of children and families when she is so eager to deny all new modern day proof that the baby suffers during an abortion and not even willing to protect the obvious reality that late term abortions common sense will tell you that is definitely murder looking at you in the eye if only that baby was able to speak.

Hillary Clinton is a phony on all counts, on every issue that she talks about you don’t know where she really stands expect that if you accept the fact that she is pure socialist through and through taught to her by Saul Alinsky whom she idolized that’s the only thing one needs to know to stay away from her. The only thing these people love is themselves and control over We The People. Anyone who really believes Hillary loves children and family has already fallen into her web of deceit and it’s up to you to come back to reality.

One comment on “Hillary Clinton Claims She Supports Children And Families: If That’s The Case She Would Not Have Such A High Protectiveness For Abortion.

  1. Rifleman III says:

    Reblogged this on .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.