Something never made sense to me in all the commotion and false narrative that was created during the presidential election between Hillary and then presidential candidate Trump and that was all this crap that Putin wanted Trump to win and he was hacking to make sure as such. Now here’s the thing that never jived and that is the fact when Hillary was Secretary of State she allowed and got committee to approve of Russia taking 20% of our uranium reserves. Naturally you never heard the media talk about any of this, maybe on page 6 of their publications and never pointing the finger to Hillary. So this being the case why would Putin be wanting Trump as President of the United States? Well for one thing he wouldn’t, This was the false narrative that was put together to distract from the real story of the fact that Russia was laundering money to The Clinton Foundation in exchange for this deal and other deals.
The following was posted by Infowars, published by Tea Party News; “Now we know why Clinton & Co. were so desperate to frame Trump with ties to Putin”
“(Infowars) – Today Infowars investigative journalist Jerome Corsi met with former vice-head of Armed Services Committee and the House Homeland Security Committee, Curt Weldon, to discuss his committees’ deep research into the Clinton technology transfers to Russia in exchange for Clinton Foundation donations. Weldon validated much that is presented in the following article, which is part one of a series of investigative articles coming out over the upcoming week based on intel by Weldon and other sources:”
“Congress may want to examine concrete evidence showing Russian President Vladimir Putin paying Hillary Clinton and John Podesta for a long time before the mainstream media goes even more overboard trying to fabricate a tie between Putin and President Donald Trump.”
“The money trail hunt begins with a document Infowars has obtained from the Russian Central Bank “Registry of Significant Control,” known generally as the “RSC Registry.”
“This document traces the ownership of Metcombank, a relatively small Russian-domiciled bank located in the Russian Ural Mountains, to ownership by Viktor Vekselberg, a Russian billionaire with close ties to Putin.”
This is really bad and so treasonous because we must recall at the time this was going down when Hillary was Secretary of State. Just a reminder, shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. We are not just talking about the uranium deal here. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spearheaded the transfer of U.S. advanced technology to Russia, some with military uses, as part of her “reset” strategy with the country. You can imagine how complex this operation must have been. Just think of all the different channels that were used to get this money into the Clinton Foundation. The easy part was to come up with the scheme to blame Trumps victorious election on the Russians to keep the real story out of the picture which was the laundering scheme that went on and could you just imagine if it had come out, there would be no presidential run for Hillary plus time in prison which depending how far the DOJ wants to go with this it is not out of the question.
For the benefit of clarity because of its complexity I am attaching the link because the John Podesta involvement with Russia is more complex than Hillary’s. Its amazing what money will do to undermine the United States of America, a complete sellout and what have you, me and everybody else been led to believe was this was all about Russia hacking the election but you see that’s the only thing the media and everybody else ever talked about and is still talking about. For the time-being it has worked, lets hope for not very long.
http://www.teaparty.org/russian-bank-docs-show-putin-laundered-money-hillary-podesta-219839/
Reblogged this on Brittius and commented:
Common street criminal tactic, where the perpetrator blames someone else who is not involved in the crime, to throw police off the trail. Hmmm…