Ever Since Obama Announced That The United States Will No Longer Be The World’s Policeman The Middle East Has been Falling Apart

It was shortly after the world had realized that Obama was not going to back up his statement of the fact that if Syria would use chemical weapons against their own people he would draw a red line.

“But if the Assad regime were to use its weapons stockpiles, or alternatively, move it around, Obama suggested military action could be on the table.”

Obama said “We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized,” the president said. “That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”

The rest is history of course. President Assad of Syria was proven to have used chemical weapons on his people again and Obama instead of fulfilling his promise of drawing the red line he would tell the American people and the world that the United States will no longer be the global policeman. What that statement did was give the bad actors in the world such as the ISIS, Iran, Russia, North Korea a feeling of opportunity such as the Middle East had not seen since President Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger via Egypt threw out Russia from the Middle East in 1973.

There was a second chance for Obama to exert U.S. leadership and that was when very recently Russia asked Obama to go in together to wipe out the ISIS. Obama used the excuse that he would not team up with Russia so long as Russia was backing up president Assad of Syria. I personally feel that Obama should have teamed up with Putin of Russia and destroy the ISIS considering that terrorist organization is the biggest threat in the world. When the United States teamed up with Russia in World War II the U.S. knew that Russia had other ambitions but the rational was to destroy Germany and work on other possible conflicts as they came along.

To summarize, Obama has given away the Middle East to Russia that for the last 40 years U.S. presidents have worked in harmony to keep them out. Our first opportunity of regaining back our leadership and respect was when the ISIS first beheaded two of out citizens, Obama instead of commencing bombings should have had a full scale attack on the ISIS. There have been thousands of airstrikes against the ISIS by American fighter jets and that has not stopped the ISIS. Secondly we should have teamed up with Putin of Russia and destroy the ISIS when Obama was asked as such by Putin. Two lost opportunities. What will be the end result of Obama’s inaction’s is first of all we have lost the Middle East to our enemies and the worst thing that is inevitable is the fact with the ISIS being allowed to survive. We The People will eventually be attacked on our mainland by the ISIS. This, all thanks to Obama who doesn’t have a clear vision, or maybe he does and always has had, and that is bring the United States in parity to the rest of the world and that my friends is impeachable and treasonous. You do not take your country from a level of supremacy to a level of weakness. We The people should not stand for this because we will pay the cost.

Advertisements

The Pieces Are Not Fitting The Puzzle In Syria

There are just too many factions in Syria that want the same end results; I am trying to rational other possibilities other than President Bashar al- Assad ordering the killing of his own people. As we know President Obama opened up his egotistic mouth about a year ago around this same time period after a chemical attack of which the finger was pointed at Assad. When Obama was asked about this he stressed the fact that Syria’s use of chemical weapons would cross the red line.

I am asking myself is it possible Assad did not order this chemical attack? Why would Assad put his military and country in such a state of destruction; suicidal in fact? Someone could say to keep his power; I say what power? he will be destroyed from both ends, military attack and the chemical weapons that he triggered. One has to be insane, is he that totally insane? His country will be lost to invasion anyhow. What if Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood got a hold of some chemical weapons and used them to frame Assad in the eyes of the International Community. If this being the case, Assad is ousted because Obama is convinced of the fact that Assad is the perpetrator. Convinced or not Obama has put himself in a box by bringing up the fact he considered the use of chemical weapons crossing the red line, now in his mind he is compelled to act.

The Great Britain Parliament voted that they don’t want to involve themselves in this pending war unless they knew for sure who was behind the chemical attack. It doesn’t look too good for the United States for Great Britain to not enter this pending war until there is concrete evidence as to who ordered this attack. My understanding is that if evidence is found Great Britain will have another Parliamentary vote. The following is from a post titled “Tariq Ali on Syrian Chemical Weapons: The Fact Is, We Don’t Know.”“Virtually no one who knows the region believes that these attacks were carried out by the Syrian government, or on its orders,” he says. “It’s crazy, if you think about it. They let the inspectors in, and then in a hotel barely 10 miles from—in a location barely 10 miles from where the inspectors are staying, there’s a chemical attack. And what good does it do the Syrian government to actually open fire on these inspectors? They want them there. So, I think it’s slightly incredible.”

I will not assume the fact that Assad had nothing to do with the chemical attack, but I feel all the pieces are not in this puzzle as of yet and if we are to go to war, with different factions in Syria ready to take over and the Russian navy ready to get involved this better not just be a trap to lure us into a conflict that was put together to do just that, lure us into a war that was rigged for us to enter. The question is, by whom?