A Federal Judge Gave President Trump An Important Victory/ Judge Declines To Block Citizenship Question For 2020 Census

US District Judge Dabney Friedrich declined to issue a preliminary injunction requested by a privacy and civil liberties nonprofit group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center.Someone might ask why is it important to make sure the citizenship question be added on the U.S. Census. There are a few good reasons but we can start that it disallows illegal aliens to benefit from their illegal behavior. Why should tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that still carry their allegiance to other countries be counted as the American citizen which as we know will also throw states into different redistricting because the count will be inflated by people who are not really American citizens.

The following was posted by Daniel Horowitz, published by Conservative Review: “Immigration was given to the Federal government to prevent states from gaming representation.”

“This is exactly why our Founders assigned control over immigration policy to the federal government. They didn’t want states to artificially inflate their representation by flooding the entire federal union with undesirable aliens. Commenting on the power of Congress (as opposed to states) over immigration, the inimitable Justice Joseph Story explained, “If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges.”

“Roger Sherman, among the greatest of all the Founders, noted during the House debate on the Naturalization Act of 1790 that “it was intended by the Convention, who framed the Constitution, that Congress should have the power of naturalization, in order to prevent particular States receiving citizens, and forcing them upon others who would not have received them in any other manner” (emphasis added). Sherman was emphatic that federal control was designed to “guard against an improper mode of naturalization” and prevent individual states from flooding the country with immigrants based on “easier terms.”

“If illegal aliens can permanently distort our representation, debase our franchise, and dilute our political power, there is no sovereignty, republican form of government, or self-respect as a nation-state. If a state can be rewarded for disenfranchising the citizenry of this country and thumbing its nose at our sovereignty, then we have no nation at all. There is no issue of greater importance than restoring the franchise to where it rightly belongs — with the citizens of these United States.”

This is why the Democratic Party was so much in favor of excluding the question if you are a U.S. citizen. This will effect sanctuary cities and the funding of because we must remember allocation of federal funds to states are based on census data and naturally the crooked Democratic Party has been dependent on these funds.

It has been brought to light that an illegal now will not answer the question being afraid to do so because ICE will be right around the corner, so naturally if the question is there its the socialists Democrats biggest worry because the funding for that corrupt state will be deflated because the count of the illegals will be way down.

President Trump and his admiration has pursued this ruling and it will be one way of bringing back America on the right tract instead of the United States being controlled by crooked politician’s. Lets say its a start of getting a real count of the real citizens of the United States.

Advertisements

Wrong Argument Was Presented To The US Supreme Court For Obama Care

The authority for the funding of Obama Care belongs to the House of Representatives not the US Senate, so what I am asking is why was this not the argument presented to the Supreme Court. These lawyers who presented the case are suppose to be top notch lawyers, why was this missed? Funding is the main responsibility of the House of Representatives. I could never understand, and I still don’t understand how the Senate funded or allowed to fund this law if they do not control the purse strings.

As much as I was and still am angry at Chief Justice Roberts for going out of his way to call Obama Care a tax which I felt he could have voted against Obama Care becoming a law right there, one good thing came out of his ruling. “Chief Justice John Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That is how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything, ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.” This is why I felt Obama Care was never going to pass the Supreme Court in the first place because they were going to use the commerce clause to get it passed and I was very sure that was not going to be the case.

Another thing came out of Judge Robert’s ruling that a lot of people forget. If you remember Obama and his cult wanted to bully the states to comply. He struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing Medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — “comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.” Roberts ruled that is a no-no.”

The following was posted by Carrie Welboro” titled The House Always Held The Purse Strings.”When the House attached Obama care to the legislation in funding the government, it made a mistake in doing so and the funding of Obama care should have been separate, thereby giving the Senate no power in denying the Houses’ request to defund Obama care.

“Still, the intent of the Founding Fathers was to give the people, through their House of Representatives, the power collectively to say no to any proposed federal tax. ”If Obama care is removed from the government budget, presented, and voted on as a separate bill, Obama care can be defunded by the House and the Senate and the President has no constitutional authority to override the House decision.”

I feel with the knowledge gathered above that if Obama Care is taken back to the Supreme Court with the argument used above it can be struck down. Like Yogi Berra, once famous catcher for the New York Yankees said in the past, “its not over till its over.” Obama Care is a hardship on the American people. The socialists in power ruined a health care system where 85% of the American people had insurance coverage for the 15% who did not. This should have been unconstitutional in itself.