What The Radical Left Is Doing Is Pushing The United States To A Social Civil War

I have written in the past that the radical left that is in control of the Democratic Party is leading America to a social civil war. The conservatives will only take it so long before they swing into action. The Democratic Party has decided that they cannot push their agenda of socializing America at the voting booth so from the beginning of Trumps Presidency to the present the President is constantly under attack. He cannot do right with these fools, day in and day out he is not allowed to do the job the people elected him to do and yet he gets up bright and early and works late into the night trying to make America a better Country to live in for the American people.

President Trump is not a mechanical machine, he is a human being with emotions and its a wonder how he is able to take what he does from the constant drumbeat of hate from the radical left and the socialistic msm. This is a punishment that no President of the United States should take. The clowns on the radical left mention at times of the harassment Marxist Obama went through, give me a break! I remember when Obama was trying to outsmart our Constitution at every turn; when Obama went after the Tea Party via the IRS; when Obama went after journalists that he didn’t agree with; when Obama sent illegal shipments of guns to Mexico, when Obama allowed Benghazi to be attacked and four of our people got killed just to give a few examples yet I did not not see a push for Obama’s impeachment.

The socialists have control of the news; the socialists have control of our school system; the socialists have control of the entertainment field all in the face of the fact that America is still a middle to right leading country and now we have our President in office and they have been talking of impeaching him before he even became President. The socialists are pushing the American people to a social civil war and what will this consist of I dont know. The thing is that once the socialists go away from the ballot box and do things with no justification and by force I get very concerned for America because I know our Founding fathers would not expect the American people to just sit back and take all this without taking action. What that action will be is any bodies guess but it is surely on its way!

Advertisements

Electoral College Wins Over The Popular Vote As Ruled By A Federal Appeals Court

How clever our Founding Fathers were by giving the infant America the Electoral College. They knew from that early time of our nation that someday that there just might be a few states with mass populations and the rest of the states would need representation and we see it happening today that without the Electoral College we would only have a handful of states calling the Presidential election most of which are blue states that are turning socialists so what would happen to the rest of the states may I ask? What would happen is that the Presidential candidates would ignore them and run mainly in those populated states which would create a great injustice to the rest of the nation. Our Founders took care of that problem manly because they had the foresight and common sense to realize that this could be the possibility some day. We have had some states wanting to undermine our Constitution and our Founding Fathers by trying to eliminate the Electoral College but a Federal Appeals Court has ruled on the issue.

The following was posted by Gregg Re, published by Fox News: “In a major blow to state-by-state progressive efforts to effectively replace the Electoral College with a nationwide popular vote, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that presidential electors in the Electoral College have the absolute right to vote for presidential candidates of their choice.”

“Democrats have increasingly sought to erase the Electoral College’s influence by promoting state laws that would force electors to vote for the national popular vote winner — and those laws were now in jeopardy as a result of the court’s ruling, legal experts said.”

“The Electoral College system is established in the Constitution. When voters cast a ballot for president, they are actually choosing members of the Electoral College, called electors, who are pledged to that presidential candidate. The electors then choose the president. Electors are selected by state parties at nominating conventions, and generally consist of party leaders, activists, and other luminaries.”

“However, a constitutional amendment eliminating the Electoral College would require two-thirds of both the House and Senate to approve the measure, along with three-fourths of state legislatures. Alternatively, Congress could hold a national convention and states could host ratifying conventions, but a two-thirds majority would still be necessary.”

I have already heard on a couple of different occasions President Trump stressed of the fact that if the Presidential election was decided on the popular vote he would just have had to change the method of his campaigning which of course that means he would have been campaigning in the most populous states and both candidates would be ignoring the rest of the country which is how I started this post. This is never going to happen considering how difficult it would be to eliminate the Electoral College as I showed in the paragraph above which would require two-thirds of both the House and Senate to approve the measure, along with three-fourths of state legislatures. All I can say is nice try socialists, It’s never going to happen!

A Federal Judge Gave President Trump An Important Victory/ Judge Declines To Block Citizenship Question For 2020 Census

US District Judge Dabney Friedrich declined to issue a preliminary injunction requested by a privacy and civil liberties nonprofit group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center.Someone might ask why is it important to make sure the citizenship question be added on the U.S. Census. There are a few good reasons but we can start that it disallows illegal aliens to benefit from their illegal behavior. Why should tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that still carry their allegiance to other countries be counted as the American citizen which as we know will also throw states into different redistricting because the count will be inflated by people who are not really American citizens.

The following was posted by Daniel Horowitz, published by Conservative Review: “Immigration was given to the Federal government to prevent states from gaming representation.”

“This is exactly why our Founders assigned control over immigration policy to the federal government. They didn’t want states to artificially inflate their representation by flooding the entire federal union with undesirable aliens. Commenting on the power of Congress (as opposed to states) over immigration, the inimitable Justice Joseph Story explained, “If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges.”

“Roger Sherman, among the greatest of all the Founders, noted during the House debate on the Naturalization Act of 1790 that “it was intended by the Convention, who framed the Constitution, that Congress should have the power of naturalization, in order to prevent particular States receiving citizens, and forcing them upon others who would not have received them in any other manner” (emphasis added). Sherman was emphatic that federal control was designed to “guard against an improper mode of naturalization” and prevent individual states from flooding the country with immigrants based on “easier terms.”

“If illegal aliens can permanently distort our representation, debase our franchise, and dilute our political power, there is no sovereignty, republican form of government, or self-respect as a nation-state. If a state can be rewarded for disenfranchising the citizenry of this country and thumbing its nose at our sovereignty, then we have no nation at all. There is no issue of greater importance than restoring the franchise to where it rightly belongs — with the citizens of these United States.”

This is why the Democratic Party was so much in favor of excluding the question if you are a U.S. citizen. This will effect sanctuary cities and the funding of because we must remember allocation of federal funds to states are based on census data and naturally the crooked Democratic Party has been dependent on these funds.

It has been brought to light that an illegal now will not answer the question being afraid to do so because ICE will be right around the corner, so naturally if the question is there its the socialists Democrats biggest worry because the funding for that corrupt state will be deflated because the count of the illegals will be way down.

President Trump and his admiration has pursued this ruling and it will be one way of bringing back America on the right tract instead of the United States being controlled by crooked politician’s. Lets say its a start of getting a real count of the real citizens of the United States.

Wrong Argument Was Presented To The US Supreme Court For Obama Care

The authority for the funding of Obama Care belongs to the House of Representatives not the US Senate, so what I am asking is why was this not the argument presented to the Supreme Court. These lawyers who presented the case are suppose to be top notch lawyers, why was this missed? Funding is the main responsibility of the House of Representatives. I could never understand, and I still don’t understand how the Senate funded or allowed to fund this law if they do not control the purse strings.

As much as I was and still am angry at Chief Justice Roberts for going out of his way to call Obama Care a tax which I felt he could have voted against Obama Care becoming a law right there, one good thing came out of his ruling. “Chief Justice John Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That is how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything, ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.” This is why I felt Obama Care was never going to pass the Supreme Court in the first place because they were going to use the commerce clause to get it passed and I was very sure that was not going to be the case.

Another thing came out of Judge Robert’s ruling that a lot of people forget. If you remember Obama and his cult wanted to bully the states to comply. He struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing Medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — “comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.” Roberts ruled that is a no-no.”

The following was posted by Carrie Welboro” titled The House Always Held The Purse Strings.”When the House attached Obama care to the legislation in funding the government, it made a mistake in doing so and the funding of Obama care should have been separate, thereby giving the Senate no power in denying the Houses’ request to defund Obama care.

“Still, the intent of the Founding Fathers was to give the people, through their House of Representatives, the power collectively to say no to any proposed federal tax. ”If Obama care is removed from the government budget, presented, and voted on as a separate bill, Obama care can be defunded by the House and the Senate and the President has no constitutional authority to override the House decision.”

I feel with the knowledge gathered above that if Obama Care is taken back to the Supreme Court with the argument used above it can be struck down. Like Yogi Berra, once famous catcher for the New York Yankees said in the past, “its not over till its over.” Obama Care is a hardship on the American people. The socialists in power ruined a health care system where 85% of the American people had insurance coverage for the 15% who did not. This should have been unconstitutional in itself.