Obamas Goal Has Been, No Exceptionlism For America

America, since it made it on the International scene after becoming victorious after World War II, was always in the dominate world stage among freedom loving people. Every president since Franklin Roosevelt has cherished America being in that position. Here are two presidents with their goals of greatness for America,

On May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy announced before a special joint session of Congress the dramatic and ambitious goal of sending an American safely to the Moon before the end of the decade. A number of political factors affected Kennedy’s decision and the timing of it. In general, Kennedy felt great pressure to have the United States “catch up to and overtake” the Soviet Union in the “space race. What has Obama done to the space program, we can’t even go to the space station without having to sit in back of the bus. We have to go with a Russian spacecraft and sit in back of the Russian astronauts. Obama has dismantled our space program. President John Kennedy must be turning over in his grave. So much for American exceptionlism.

“As Ronald Reagan emphasized, America is a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere.” Even though Ronald Reagan was from another era in American history the young people of America loved him and he brought back patriotism to America after four years of negativeness brought on by President Jimmy Carter.

Obama doesn’t believe the United States is exceptional or even wants it to be. He believes in the new world order, lower the expectations for America; level the playing field. The only accomplishment he has is Obama Care and that is definitely not exceptional in any sense of the word. This is a health care program that is going to prevent jobs because business will not be hiring. Obama is lowering the standards and high expectations of our economy by destroying it.

As a candidate in 2008 a snapshot came across the news wires showing Obama holding Fareed Zakaria book titled “The Post- American World.” I remember that picture, it was all over the internet.The vicious Zakaria describes his book this way: “This is not a book about the decline of America, but rather about the rise of everyone else.” In it, he details the era he hopes we are entering now — a world in which the United States would “no longer dominate the global economy, orchestrate geopolitics, or overwhelm cultures.” Just look at what has gone on in the world stage since Obama has become President, that is exactly what he is doing, he is taking us away from being a dominate force in the world stage.

This is what Obamas game plan has been. He turned against our allies (particularly Israel) and showed them that America could not be relied on. He taxed us into poverty and stirred up racial strife to make us all less safe. He has enabled Russia to re-emerge as a world power, and the Islamic jihadists are bolder than ever.

Obama vowed to make America just another nation — unexceptional — and he has. It’s not that other nations have risen. They haven’t. It’s that Obama has dismantled American hegemony and diminished our standing in the world.

Obama is allied himself with organizations around the world that would have been unheard of from past presidents such as the Muslim Brotherhood. Even though we are still a Christian Judaea nation Obama does not speak up when Christians are slaughtered around the world. Every terrorist attack but one in the US has been by Muslims, but Obama will not acknowledge the fact, he still calls them groups instead of what they are, vicious murderers and we are not to label them as what they really are in Obamas eyes. I will tell you one thing, I don’t feel as protected as I once felt in America and I don’t think you should either.

America is slipping into a country that I never knew before, and believe me that is by design. Obamas design. This president is dangerous and the faster his four years are up the better, if in fact he is not impeached first. If our enemies overseas do not look at us as an exceptional country any longer that means they will attempt daring attacks of devastation against us until it reaches our homeland. Exceptionlism has been America since World War II and along comes Obama and he wants us to belong to the world order, in other words level the playing field, we need to turn this around with a true leader, and rid ourselves of these socialists that are infiltrating our society. I want to say that my country is exceptional again.

President Ronald Reagan Had A Clear Vision As To How To Handle Conflicts Such As Syria.

Early on when Ronald Reagan was still an unknown as far as politics was concerned President Dwight Eisenhower was asked his opinion on Ronald Reagan and he answered not to under estimate Reagan he has a considerable amount of common sense. I have seen people in my life time who were intelligent by no means. They were book smart but that is as far as it goes. President Obama falls into that category; I feel by his actions or lack of them he is lacking a large amount of common sense. Take presently in Syria, he has not given us the American people a clear vision as to what he wants to do over there. What are America’s objectives for invading Syria? What are we going to do if we or Israel are counter attacked by what ever means the enemy might use? If President Assad is weakened and falls who will take over? Lets let imagination run for a moment, is this just a scheme by Obama to get the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Syria? Obama has to make the argument to us that this attack is for the vital interest of the United States, and this is what is lacking from him, he can’t.

President Reagan had a clear vision as how to handle conflicts such as the one we are facing today. Reagan established these principles after nearly 300 American and French troops were killed in an attack on their barracks in Beirut in 1983. He listed them in his autobiography:

1. The United States should not commit its forces to military action overseas unless the cause is vital to our national interest.

2. If the decision is made to commit our forces to combat abroad, it must be done with the clear intent and support needed to win. It should not be a halfway or tentative commitment, and there must be clearly defined and realistic objectives.

3. Before we commit our troops to combat, there must be reasonable assurance that the cause we are fighting for and the actions we take will have the support of the American people and Congress. (We all felt that the Vietnam War had turned into such a tragedy because military action had been undertaken without sufficient assurances that the American people were behind it.)

4. Even after all these other combat tests are met, our troops should be committed to combat abroad only as a last resort, when no other choice is available. (Ronald Reagan: An American Life, 466)

What is missing with Obamas plan or as I would call it, lack of plan, he has not convinced us that an invasion is to the vital interest of the United States and he has not shown clear intent and support needed to win. I believe he doesn’t have a plan, I heard that their plan has changed over fifty times. How do you put our armed forces into action if you don’t have a plan? You just don’t. That would be immoral.

The Pieces Are Not Fitting The Puzzle In Syria

There are just too many factions in Syria that want the same end results; I am trying to rational other possibilities other than President Bashar al- Assad ordering the killing of his own people. As we know President Obama opened up his egotistic mouth about a year ago around this same time period after a chemical attack of which the finger was pointed at Assad. When Obama was asked about this he stressed the fact that Syria’s use of chemical weapons would cross the red line.

I am asking myself is it possible Assad did not order this chemical attack? Why would Assad put his military and country in such a state of destruction; suicidal in fact? Someone could say to keep his power; I say what power? he will be destroyed from both ends, military attack and the chemical weapons that he triggered. One has to be insane, is he that totally insane? His country will be lost to invasion anyhow. What if Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood got a hold of some chemical weapons and used them to frame Assad in the eyes of the International Community. If this being the case, Assad is ousted because Obama is convinced of the fact that Assad is the perpetrator. Convinced or not Obama has put himself in a box by bringing up the fact he considered the use of chemical weapons crossing the red line, now in his mind he is compelled to act.

The Great Britain Parliament voted that they don’t want to involve themselves in this pending war unless they knew for sure who was behind the chemical attack. It doesn’t look too good for the United States for Great Britain to not enter this pending war until there is concrete evidence as to who ordered this attack. My understanding is that if evidence is found Great Britain will have another Parliamentary vote. The following is from a post titled “Tariq Ali on Syrian Chemical Weapons: The Fact Is, We Don’t Know.”“Virtually no one who knows the region believes that these attacks were carried out by the Syrian government, or on its orders,” he says. “It’s crazy, if you think about it. They let the inspectors in, and then in a hotel barely 10 miles from—in a location barely 10 miles from where the inspectors are staying, there’s a chemical attack. And what good does it do the Syrian government to actually open fire on these inspectors? They want them there. So, I think it’s slightly incredible.”

I will not assume the fact that Assad had nothing to do with the chemical attack, but I feel all the pieces are not in this puzzle as of yet and if we are to go to war, with different factions in Syria ready to take over and the Russian navy ready to get involved this better not just be a trap to lure us into a conflict that was put together to do just that, lure us into a war that was rigged for us to enter. The question is, by whom?