President Trump Can Use Many Immigration Laws That Are Already On The Books That Were Ignored By Obama

How many times have we heard when Obama and his cronies wanted more gun control laws that there were enough gun laws on the books already if they would only use them. That also applies to immigration laws that are already on the books but Obama and his cronies ignored. They ignored them because they did not want to enforce the immigration laws as a means to round up these illegal immigrants. Trump has so many means at his disposal to round up the illegal immigrants and extradite them anytime he deems necessary. Now somebody will say that the word extradite applies to people who have performed a crime and are being sent back to their country of origin. This is what the liberals (socialists) just don’t get, these immigrants did perform a crime by coming to the United States illegally. Lets not forget that there was a modern day president by the name of Dwight Eisenhower who did round up about two million illegal immigrants and sent them back. By the way, how many years now have we been hearing about these 11 million illegal immigrants? Maybe somewhere around twenty years. Lets change that number, you know numbers do move and in the case of illegal immigrants I would guess 20 million or more would be the correct number.

The following was posted by Angry Patriot Movement, published by Tea Party News: “These memos are not connected to the executive order that banned migrants from seven countries in the Middle East, which is now being held up in court and being revised by officials because of whiny liberals.”

“Kelly explained that they will also be advising agencies to use the often forgotten parts of the law that Obama was determined to ignore.”

“If someone is removed from the country by expedited removal, it is illegal for them to attempt to enter again for five years. Under this new procedure, people have to prove they have been living in this country for all of at least two years. If they can’t, then they may be deported by this process.”

We finally have a president in Donald Trump who is taking this illegal immigration problem serious. These illegals have been crossing the border into the United States to take advantage of our benefits, use our hospitals in emergencies and enroll in our school systems as though we don’t have enough overcrowding already. The brain-dead liberals don’t see anything wrong with all this even in some states allowing these illegals to go for drivers licensing. This has to stop and stop fast and Trump as We The People can see is keeping his word that enough is enough with this illegal immigration mess.

The most important information gathered from all this is that all the laws were there to deport as many illegals as caught and Obama sat on it. In all fairness other recent president could have used these same laws to do exactly as what Trump has, giving the order to commence deportation. The thing is Obama not only didn’t he use all the laws rendered to him but he actually made it easier for the illegals to come in and stay with the orders he was giving to the border patrols via the Dept. of Homeland Security and this was at a time when terrorists have been slipping through our borders. Yes, the illegals have had their day and now We The People will have ours via President Donald Trump.


The United States Supreme Court Is Now We The People’s Thanks To The Election Of President Donald Trump

For people who were leaning on the fence of whether to vote for Donald Trump or sit it out the number one issue that I heard people talk about more than any other was the fact if the U.S. Supreme Court was lost to Hillary Clinton and the Democrats it would be a catastrophe and for that issue being so very important they would probably vote for Trump. I would say in the next four years there will be three new openings on the bench maybe as many as four. If four young Justices were to be appointed to the high court you are talking about maybe as many as fifty years of control from the party in power. We know that the Democrats have leaned left like they have never before and after Trump’s victory they are showing they will be even going more left with the people they are talking about putting in power and that means the Court would be going ever so much left and we all know what that would mean to our Constitution, kiss it goodbye!

The following was posted by Adam Liptak, published by The New York Times: ” The election of Donald J. Trump means that Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat, vacant since he died in February, will almost certainly be filled by a conservative nominee. Back to full strength, the court will again tilt right, as it has for decades.”

“And with the court’s two senior liberal members fairly old, that may be only the start. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer is 78.”

A few months ago Donald Trump wisely came out with a list of 21 leaning conservatives that he would recommend for the Supreme Court if he was to win the election and had the opportunity to appoint. By doing so at the time it gave a relief to conservatives within the Republican Party to lean towards Trump.

It’s true that when a president appoints a Supreme Court Justice there have been some surprises along the way and it’s usually Republican appointees. The Democrats as always stick to their ideology and never waiver. President Eisenhower once said that the worst decision he ever made as president was to appoint Chief Just Earl Warren to the Supreme Court. President George W. Bush gave the Court Chief Justice John Roberts and he turned into a Benedict Arnold who kissed up to Obama in regard to Obama Care. One thing we do know though and that is a Democrat appointee would be an automatic socialist-Marxist whereas a Trump appointee We The People have a good chance that if they voted along conservative lines before there would be a good chance they will continue to do so. Yes, good job President-elect Donald Trump.

President Ronald Reagan Had A Clear Vision As To How To Handle Conflicts Such As Syria.

Early on when Ronald Reagan was still an unknown as far as politics was concerned President Dwight Eisenhower was asked his opinion on Ronald Reagan and he answered not to under estimate Reagan he has a considerable amount of common sense. I have seen people in my life time who were intelligent by no means. They were book smart but that is as far as it goes. President Obama falls into that category; I feel by his actions or lack of them he is lacking a large amount of common sense. Take presently in Syria, he has not given us the American people a clear vision as to what he wants to do over there. What are America’s objectives for invading Syria? What are we going to do if we or Israel are counter attacked by what ever means the enemy might use? If President Assad is weakened and falls who will take over? Lets let imagination run for a moment, is this just a scheme by Obama to get the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Syria? Obama has to make the argument to us that this attack is for the vital interest of the United States, and this is what is lacking from him, he can’t.

President Reagan had a clear vision as how to handle conflicts such as the one we are facing today. Reagan established these principles after nearly 300 American and French troops were killed in an attack on their barracks in Beirut in 1983. He listed them in his autobiography:

1. The United States should not commit its forces to military action overseas unless the cause is vital to our national interest.

2. If the decision is made to commit our forces to combat abroad, it must be done with the clear intent and support needed to win. It should not be a halfway or tentative commitment, and there must be clearly defined and realistic objectives.

3. Before we commit our troops to combat, there must be reasonable assurance that the cause we are fighting for and the actions we take will have the support of the American people and Congress. (We all felt that the Vietnam War had turned into such a tragedy because military action had been undertaken without sufficient assurances that the American people were behind it.)

4. Even after all these other combat tests are met, our troops should be committed to combat abroad only as a last resort, when no other choice is available. (Ronald Reagan: An American Life, 466)

What is missing with Obamas plan or as I would call it, lack of plan, he has not convinced us that an invasion is to the vital interest of the United States and he has not shown clear intent and support needed to win. I believe he doesn’t have a plan, I heard that their plan has changed over fifty times. How do you put our armed forces into action if you don’t have a plan? You just don’t. That would be immoral.