The New York Times Puts The Lie Of Benghazi Back To The Forefront

Here we are years removed from the attack on Benghazi with all sorts of evidence that the attacke was inspired by Al Qaeda and the NY Times has come out to say that they know that an anti-Islam film played a role for the attack.

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said his panel has gone through 4,000 classified cables, talked to people on the ground and done a postmortem on the event. He said he doubts weather the times has conducted such an exhausted investigation.

Senior Obama Administration officials told NBC News, that the White House does not dispute the New York Times report. Off course they would not dispute the Times report. It is lies. What is it to the Times to lie about this? I will tell you what this is all about. This is all about Hillary Clinton running for president with the full backing of the New York Times. They are trying to justify the lying of Hillary Clinton. Its not going to fool the American people or the Committees who are investigating Benghazi. Never mind Hillary running for president, her emphasis and number one priority should be keeping herself out of jail for not protecting our people in Libya. That was her job. Like Charles Krauthammer said and I totally agree, Hillary and Obama disappeared for around eight hours during the night of the Benghazi attack where nobody knew where they were. They were spending that time talking with each other to come up with a cover story and that’s when they came up with the You Tube video story. They should both be prosecuted for allowing four Americans to die.

Advertisements