How Dare Pathetic Democrats Question CIA Pick Gina Haspel’s Moral Character!

Those pathetic socialist Democrats never cease to amaze me of their hatred of America! If they loved their country they would not be questioning President Trump’s CIA pick on of all things her moral character. Sure if they want to play their little obstructionist games they can question Haspel on many things to go through their socialistic game plan but when the Democrats question a CIA person like Haspel by bringing in her moral capacity that is going beyond a stretch, now they are showing how they would go to any means to destroy a person’s character just to arose their left wing radical base.

I assume the Democrats have forgotten that day when the Twin Towers in New York were destroyed and the main thing was that the United States of America came under attack and for awhile there we did not know what was going to be next; I assume the Democrats have forgotten that day when the Pentagon was attacked in Washington D.C by a Boeing 757 Jetliner; I assume the Democrats have forgotten that United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania on the way to our nations capital which was prevented from doing so because there were American hero’s on board that attacked the terrorists who kidnapped the plane which prevented it to reach it’s target of the capital. You would think that these left-wing radical disgusting (kind word) Democrats who kidnapped the Democratic Party would have remembered that day because if they did they would not have been asking CIA pick Gina Haspel such degrading questions.

The following was posted by Adam Shaw, published by Fox News: “At the hearing, Haspel said she was confident she would not allow the CIA to engage in illegal or immoral activity, even if it came from a presidential order.”

“My moral compass is strong, I would not allow CIA to undertake activity that I thought was immoral even if it was technically legal — I would absolutely not permit it.”

“But some Democrats challenged her answers, particularly what Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., described as “legalistic” responses — but Haspel refused to criticize actions by colleagues.”

“I’m not going to sit here with the benefit of hindsight and judge the very good people who made hard decisions who were running the agency in very extraordinary circumstances at the time,” she said.”

“It did little to stop the criticism, however. “Where was that moral compass at the time?” Heinrich asked.”

In September 2002 four members of the Congress a bipartisan group were briefed on waterboarding by the CIA at overseas CIA detention sites and who do you think one of those Congress people were, why Nancy Pelosi herself, (D Calif), two lawmakers in the room even asked the CIA to push harder and yet years later waterboarding became a poison of a word.

Let me tell you one thing when the United States comes under attack I will say any means possible should be used to prevent any Americans being killed in the future. One thing that is not emphasized enough is the fact that it was waterboarding that eventually led to the killing of Bin Laden and the Bush Administration had claimed that there were three that were actually waterboarded and there is always an argument that there were more but thats not the point. The United States comes under attack the President is obligated to safeguard the American people and the radical left Democrats as a whole complain about waterboarding when there are countries out there that will chop our military peoples heads off, give me a break!

Advertisements