The Congress Cannot Take Away The Ability Of The President Of The United States To Make Instant Decisions To Safeguard American Citizens

Crazy speaker of The House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi is at it again with her radical socialist Democrat Party wanting to strip President Trump of instant decision making because she claims any President must go through the Congress with the fool forgetting or not realizing that if passed it would also apply to any future Democrat President. In today’s age of missiles, drones that Marxist Obama just loved to use often enough or lets say a missile is on its way to the United States how the hell would President Trump or any other future President be able to convey some committee at the spur of the moment it being that most of them just like to hear themselves talk in the first place with nothing getting done. This request is insanity in the first degree and the more these socialists continue to act in this fashion the more they are losing the Independent voter.

I can just picture one of our Founding Fathers and first President of the United States coming back in some time machine and watching Pelosi and her comrade socialists at their best nonsense. Washington was President at the time of the Whiskey Rebellion that he helped squash himself, Lets look back at some history: “According to biographer Joseph Ellis in His Excellency, George Washington, the aging president mounted his horse on September 30 to lead a force of 13,000–larger than any American army amassed in one place during the Revolution–to quell the uprising. (The act of mounting his war horse was brief and largely symbolic; Washington made most of the journey by carriage.) Lee joined Washington and the army on its march to Pennsylvania. This was the first and only time a sitting American president ever led troops into battle. Washington abandoned the procession early, however, leaving Alexander Hamilton, the true mastermind of the military response to the insurrection, in charge of the final approach to Pittsburgh.”

The United States Embassy was attacked in Baghdad Iraq now just picture President George Washington being advised he would have to notify House Speaker Nancy Pelosi before he made the decision to send in troops to protect its American citizens in the inside of the American Embassy in Baghdad Iraq that was under attack. He would probably ask where is this Home Depot you have been telling me about I need to get some rope and I want to make it public.

I assume that if there was a declaration of war from the Congress to begin with the President would be able to do what needs to be done as President with no questions asked considering it was coordinated with the Congress. There have been three non-declared wars in my lifetime that should have been. The Korean War which was a UN action President Harry Truman at the time; the Vietnam war President Lyndon Johnson at the time; both Iraq wars President George H.W. Bush in the first and President George W. Bush in the second and the Afghanistan War President George W. Bush. These should have been declared wars.

The Congress cannot have it both ways, relinquish its declaration of war responsibility and at the same time complain when the President in this case being Donald Trump attempting to handcuff him from performing his duties which is his number one duty, to safe guard the safety of the people of the United States. President Trump has talked against war all through his life so he is not one to just start sending missiles all over the place. As usual Pelosi and her socialist radical Democrat Party is putting hatred for Trump over love of country, yes these people are sick! No other way to explain it! The other way to explain it is that President Trump stands in the way of converting the United States into complete socialism. My patriots thats what its all about and thats why there’s so much hatred but they can hate all they want, Trump has We The People behind him, lets say we are the real patriots and the radical socialist Democrat Party can just stick it and they will in November!

President Ronald Reagan Had A Clear Vision As To How To Handle Conflicts Such As Syria.

Early on when Ronald Reagan was still an unknown as far as politics was concerned President Dwight Eisenhower was asked his opinion on Ronald Reagan and he answered not to under estimate Reagan he has a considerable amount of common sense. I have seen people in my life time who were intelligent by no means. They were book smart but that is as far as it goes. President Obama falls into that category; I feel by his actions or lack of them he is lacking a large amount of common sense. Take presently in Syria, he has not given us the American people a clear vision as to what he wants to do over there. What are America’s objectives for invading Syria? What are we going to do if we or Israel are counter attacked by what ever means the enemy might use? If President Assad is weakened and falls who will take over? Lets let imagination run for a moment, is this just a scheme by Obama to get the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Syria? Obama has to make the argument to us that this attack is for the vital interest of the United States, and this is what is lacking from him, he can’t.

President Reagan had a clear vision as how to handle conflicts such as the one we are facing today. Reagan established these principles after nearly 300 American and French troops were killed in an attack on their barracks in Beirut in 1983. He listed them in his autobiography:

1. The United States should not commit its forces to military action overseas unless the cause is vital to our national interest.

2. If the decision is made to commit our forces to combat abroad, it must be done with the clear intent and support needed to win. It should not be a halfway or tentative commitment, and there must be clearly defined and realistic objectives.

3. Before we commit our troops to combat, there must be reasonable assurance that the cause we are fighting for and the actions we take will have the support of the American people and Congress. (We all felt that the Vietnam War had turned into such a tragedy because military action had been undertaken without sufficient assurances that the American people were behind it.)

4. Even after all these other combat tests are met, our troops should be committed to combat abroad only as a last resort, when no other choice is available. (Ronald Reagan: An American Life, 466)

What is missing with Obamas plan or as I would call it, lack of plan, he has not convinced us that an invasion is to the vital interest of the United States and he has not shown clear intent and support needed to win. I believe he doesn’t have a plan, I heard that their plan has changed over fifty times. How do you put our armed forces into action if you don’t have a plan? You just don’t. That would be immoral.

Will Obama’s Road To Impeachment Be The Same As Nixon’s

A couple of days ago they released the last tapes on Nixon and Watergate. Those were very troubled days for me. In 1968 I campaigned for Richard Nixon door to door. I felt he was the intelligent and strong person our country needed for the times. One thing his critics never took away from him was his intelligence. He was paranoid with the news media considering they hated his guts. They hated him ever since he exposed Alger Hiss to the world as being a spy in the Roosevelt Administration. He inherited the Vietnam war which he brought to a respectable truce with both South and North Vietnam going back to their respectful borders. He accomplished this by mining the port of Hanoi, and bombing Hanoi for two straight weeks over our Christmas Holidays. He started the war on cancer which is still being funded since then from that bill. He did start the environmental agency but never in his mind did he think it would get so out of hand. He wrote in one of his last books, “yes I started the environmental agency but it was not meant to ruin a whole industry to save the owl.” He opened the doors to China because he said you cannot ignore 800 million people which was what their population was at that time, and also for trade purposes which helps us no doubt, but he also wanted to expose China to the capitalistic system. Who would have known then that the stupidity of our diplomats would have allowed China to loan us so much money that we have lost any bargaining chips with them that we should have had. Just before Watergate he was working on a National Health plan that would have been a free market system, but once Watergate started in full earnest it took away from the attention this health bill would have needed.

Everyone knows that the media hated Nixon. If it wasn’t for this hatred I feel there would never have been a Watergate. When Watergate broke Nixon would have gone to the American people and advised us as to what had happened and that would have been the end of it. Maybe that’s what he should have done anyhow, who knows. The 1972 Presidential election was coming up and Nixon was worried that the media would take this news and destroy him. Now we come to the same parallel of Nixon and Obama. Nixon went on to win with a landslide, winning 49 states. On this last Nixon tape he speaks of the fact that Watergate will just blow over. Obama’s parallel is Benghazi in relation to the Presidential election. Just let it blow over by lying as to what really happened, to win the election. As we saw Romney had Obama on the ropes after the first debate but did not follow up in the last two which he could have if he used Benghazi.

The difference is that Nixon was not involved in Watergate, but he chose to cover it up. Obama is deeply involved in Benghazi and four other scandals and hopes to brain wash the public that they are all phony. The main parallel is that both Nixon and Obama just wished it to go away and time would have done it, the problem to that is facts just don’t go away. They are there, just waiting to be uncovered.

Nixon had a hostile news media. Actor John Wayne whom Nixon and Wayne were friends once told Nixon, Mr. President I can’t understand why you just don’t take the tapes to the front lawn of the White House and just burn them. I assume they would have gotten Nixon for destroying Government property, I don’t know, what else.

Now in Obama’s case the big difference is that the media loves him and he knows it. Will that prevent justice from being served? I hope not. We shall see. They should still put the pieces together and hope for the better judgment of the American people to put the pressure on. As I have said many times, if the Republicans get full control of Congress in 2014, impeachment is a guarantee