How Dare Pathetic Democrats Question CIA Pick Gina Haspel’s Moral Character!

Those pathetic socialist Democrats never cease to amaze me of their hatred of America! If they loved their country they would not be questioning President Trump’s CIA pick on of all things her moral character. Sure if they want to play their little obstructionist games they can question Haspel on many things to go through their socialistic game plan but when the Democrats question a CIA person like Haspel by bringing in her moral capacity that is going beyond a stretch, now they are showing how they would go to any means to destroy a person’s character just to arose their left wing radical base.

I assume the Democrats have forgotten that day when the Twin Towers in New York were destroyed and the main thing was that the United States of America came under attack and for awhile there we did not know what was going to be next; I assume the Democrats have forgotten that day when the Pentagon was attacked in Washington D.C by a Boeing 757 Jetliner; I assume the Democrats have forgotten that United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania on the way to our nations capital which was prevented from doing so because there were American hero’s on board that attacked the terrorists who kidnapped the plane which prevented it to reach it’s target of the capital. You would think that these left-wing radical disgusting (kind word) Democrats who kidnapped the Democratic Party would have remembered that day because if they did they would not have been asking CIA pick Gina Haspel such degrading questions.

The following was posted by Adam Shaw, published by Fox News: “At the hearing, Haspel said she was confident she would not allow the CIA to engage in illegal or immoral activity, even if it came from a presidential order.”

“My moral compass is strong, I would not allow CIA to undertake activity that I thought was immoral even if it was technically legal — I would absolutely not permit it.”

“But some Democrats challenged her answers, particularly what Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., described as “legalistic” responses — but Haspel refused to criticize actions by colleagues.”

“I’m not going to sit here with the benefit of hindsight and judge the very good people who made hard decisions who were running the agency in very extraordinary circumstances at the time,” she said.”

“It did little to stop the criticism, however. “Where was that moral compass at the time?” Heinrich asked.”

In September 2002 four members of the Congress a bipartisan group were briefed on waterboarding by the CIA at overseas CIA detention sites and who do you think one of those Congress people were, why Nancy Pelosi herself, (D Calif), two lawmakers in the room even asked the CIA to push harder and yet years later waterboarding became a poison of a word.

Let me tell you one thing when the United States comes under attack I will say any means possible should be used to prevent any Americans being killed in the future. One thing that is not emphasized enough is the fact that it was waterboarding that eventually led to the killing of Bin Laden and the Bush Administration had claimed that there were three that were actually waterboarded and there is always an argument that there were more but thats not the point. The United States comes under attack the President is obligated to safeguard the American people and the radical left Democrats as a whole complain about waterboarding when there are countries out there that will chop our military peoples heads off, give me a break!

Obama’s Favorite Line “Al Qaeda Is On The Run”

You remember when Bin Laden was killed and Obama gave his (i) speech in front of the American people. You would have thought Obama was with the Navy Seals. He was boasting that Al Qaeda was on the run and Osama Bin Laden was dead. Yes Al Qaeda is on the run, running after us not away from us. You would have thought that maybe he would give President Bush some credit considering it was Bush’s waterboarding that led to the killing of Bin Laden. Are you kidding me, waterboarding is a dirty word in Obama’s vocabulary, after all professors don’t use waterboarding in the eyes of the world, that just wouldn’t be nice. What would other countries do to us American’s if we got caught, never mind that they had already been beheading American’s long before waterboarding.

So Obama tried to impress the American people that because Bin Laden was dead we were close to wiping out Al Qaeda and that they were on the run. If Obama was insane enough to believe that I know the majority of Americans knew better. When you are in war and the General gets killed, is that it? Do you lay down your arms and surrender? Of course not. At the time Bin Laden got killed I don’t even think he was totally in charge any longer. He got the system going and passed the instructions to others as the present event’s are showing.

Al Qaeda senses weakness, and that weakness is Obama. They are probably saying what a naïve character. The mission after 9/11 put forth by Bush was to go on offense, and the enemy was aware of this. It kept them in check. What they see now in Obama is going from playing offense to playing defense. When you play defense it allows the enemy to do most of the striking. They watch and observe. For instance they saw that Russia gave Obama the Boston bomber on a silver platter and still he allowed this fanatic to do his damage on Boston. They watch all this and they see Obama is not only just playing defense but he doesn’t know what he is doing. Look who he put in as National Security Advisory, none other than Susan Rice, the patsy of Hillary Clinton and Obama in Benghazi. If we see lying and a big screw up in Benghazi what do you think Al Qaeda sees?

I understand the fact that it was necessary to close 22 embassies all things considering, but I will tell you one thing, Obama doesn’t know what he is doing and if he has to rely on a Susan Rice and some of those other weird people of his that I see on the news, God help us, God help our main land from attack, God Bless the United States of America.